CYBER
CYBER
Dec 3, 2020
Amazon Hired Pinkertons to Union Bust
Play • 27 min

Founded in 1850 by Allan Pinkerton, a Scottish immigrant that went on to become the first detective in the history of Chicago, the Pinkerton Detective Agency became synonymous in American life with conspiracy theories and violent clandestine activities—and with good reason. Though Pinkerton himself was one of the Union’s first spymasters during the Civil War and foiled an assassination plot on President Lincoln in 1861, he did what every ex-intelligence community type does after wars nowadays: Uses his government skills and contacts to profit in the private sector. 


In its early years the agency, something of a precursor to the infamous Blackwater mercenary outfit founded by Erik Prince that is linked to war crimes in Iraq, was at one time bigger than the U.S. Army and connected to outlandishly villainous plots that were in fact true. For example, Pinkerton agents were actually the private armies for the rich industrial titans of the Gilded Age, helping union bust and infiltrate workers groups. Even going so far as to shoot striking workers like a private-death-squad-for-hire in Colorado. Pinkerton agents were also alleged to have firebombed the home of the outlaw Jesse James’ mother (while James wasn’t there), blowing her arm off and killing his half-brother. Both weren’t involved in any of the ex-Confederate’s crimes. 


Well, unlike most companies founded almost two-hundred years ago, the Pinkerton agency still exists and recently, not unlike how the capitalist behemoths of yesteryear used it, it was hired by Jeff Bezos’s Amazon to union bust in Europe. 


Motherboard reporter Lauren Kaori-Gurley is on CYBER this week to talk about her scoop.

 

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Cyberlaw Podcast
The Cyberlaw Podcast
Steptoe & Johnson LLP
Episode 345: How COVID-Tracking Phone Apps Failed
We interview Jane Bambauer on the failure of COVID-tracking phone apps. She and Brian Ray are the author of "COVID-19 Apps Are Terrible—They Didn't Have to Be," a paper for Lawfare's Digital Social Contract project. It turns out that, despite high hopes, the failure of these apps was overdetermined, mainly by twenty years of privacy scandalmongering and privacy laws. In essence, Google and Apple set far too strict rules for the apps in an effort to avoid privacy-based political attacks, and the governments that could have reined them in surrendered instead, in order to avoid privacy-based political attacks. So, we have no one to blame but ourselves, and our delusional enthusiasm for privacy.; In the news roundup, suddenly face recognition isn't toxic at all, since it can be used to identify pro-Trump protestors. And, of course, we have always been at war with Oceania. Dave Aitel explains why face recognition might work even with a mask but still not be very good. And Jane Bambauer reprises her recent amicus argument that Illinois's biometric privacy law is a violation of the first amendment.; If you heard last week’s episode about Silicon Valley speech suppression, you might be interested in seeing the proposal I came up with then, now elaborated into a Washington Post Op-Ed. Meanwhile, Dave reports that Parler may be back from the dead but dependent on Russian infrastructure. Dave wants to know if that means Parler can be treated by the Biden team like TikTok was treated by the Trump administration.; Dave also brings us up to speed on the latest SolarWinds news. He also casts a skeptical eye on a recent New York Times article pointing fingers at JetBrains as a possible avenue of attack. The story was anonymously sourced and remains conspicuously unconfirmed by other reporting.; Not dead yet, the Trump administration has delivered regulations for administering the executive order allowing the exclusion of risky components from the national IT and communications infrastructure. Maury Shenk explains the basics.; Speaking of which, China is getting ready to strike back at such measures, borrowing the basic blocking statute rubric invented by the Europeans. Blocking statutes can be effective, but only by putting private companies in a vise between two inconsistent legal duties. Bad news for the companies, but more work for lawyers.; I ride one more hobbyhorse, critiquing Mozilla's decision to protect "user privacy" while imposing new burdens and risks on enterprise security. The object of my ire is Firefox's Encrypted Client Hello. Dave corrects my tech but more or less confirmed that this is one more nail in the coffin for CISO control of corporate networks.; Matthew Heiman and I dig into the latest ransomware gang tactics – going after top executive emails to raise the pressure to pay. The answer? I argue for more fake emails.; In a few quick hits, Maury tells us about the CNIL's decision that privacy law prevents France from using drones to enforce its coronavirus rules.; I note a new FDIC cybersecurity rule that isn't (yay!) grounded in personal data protection.; Maury explains the recently EU advocate general's opinion, which would probably make Schrems II even less negotiable than it is now. If it's adopted by the European Court of Justice, which I argue it will be unless the Court can find some resolution that is even more anti-American can the advocate general’s proposal.; And, finally, Matthew tells us that the State Department has reorganized to deal with cyber issues – a reorganization that may not last longer than a few months.; And more. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not reflect the opinions of their institutions, clients, friends, families, or pets.
1 hr 15 min
This Week in Tech (Audio)
This Week in Tech (Audio)
TWiT
TWiT 806: Make Hella Happen - CES 2021, Samsung Galaxy S21, Section 230, escaping big tech, Clubhouse
CES 2021, Samsung Galaxy S21, Section 230, escaping big tech, Clubhouse * Misinformation has slowed now that Trump is off Twitter. * Denise describes the effects of Section 230 on big tech. * Is it possible for someone to escape big tech if they want to? * Germany and France don't agree with Trump's deplatforming. * Is CES 2021 the model for trade shows going forward? * IoT at the Consumer Electronics Show. * Samsung unveiled the Galaxy S21 series smartphone. * Galaxy S21 will not support MST payments. * Samsung Galaxy SmartTag with UWB support. * Justine and David spot the biggest trends from CES 2021. * GM announced BrightDrop for commercial electric vehicles. * Google's acquisition of Fitbit is complete. * Apple might soon charge for certain podcasts. * Justine introduces Leo to Clubhouse. * Are TikTok's new age limitations good for users? * Differences between Huawei and Xiaomi in the eyes of the US. * Intel CEO Bob Swan is out, Pat Gelsinger is in. * Walmart's e-commerce chief's city of the future. * Bill Gates and all of his collection of farmland. * From petabytes to hellabytes. Host: Leo Laporte Guests: Justine Ezarik, Denise Howell, and David Ruddock Download or subscribe to this show at https://twit.tv/shows/this-week-in-tech Sponsors: * www.stamps.com - promo code: TWIT * itpro.tv/twit use the code TWIT30 * casper.com/twit1 - promo code: TWIT1
2 hr 6 min
More episodes
Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu