Biden to seize rural lands - Episode 96 - Hour 1 Biden To Seize Rural Lands
Play • 51 min

THE THESIS: It’s a continuation of their slow push to force everybody but billionaire Party Members into city-states: a plan to have the federal beast control 30% of our land and water. And, they continue to gobble up farmland, which leads us to the behavioral kill chute of requiring fake meat and factory processed non-foods for survival. 

THE SCRIPTURE & SCRIPTURAL RESOURCES: 

Leviticus 19:13

“You must not defraud your neighbor or rob him. You must not withhold until morning the wages due a hired hand.”

Joseph’s Successful Management of the Food Crisis (Genesis 41:46-57; 47:13-26)

Exodus 12:49

49 The same law applies both to the native-born and to the foreigner residing among you.”

Exodus 22:21

21 “Do not mistreat or oppress a foreigner, for you were foreigners in Egypt.

THE NEWS & COMMENT:

The cartels get to have operational control over our so-called “Southern Border.”

Peter Doocy: What's your plan for the 18,000 illegal aliens a day crossing the border after Title 42 ends?  Psaki: I don't know where you're getting that number.  Doocy: Your own Department of Homeland Security.

TX Rep. Chip Roy UNLOADS on Jerry Nadler - then asks him a question that makes the room go SILENT 

But, the federal government has all sorts of power to seize and control OUR LAND!

Crop Prices clip

Environmentalist’s latest land-grab scheme: The '30 x 30' initiative

Biden’s 30 X 30 land grab

Bloomberg teaches farming

April 4, 2021: The Biden administration will pay farmers more money not to farm

The goal is to add 4 million acres of farmland to the Conservation Reserve Program, which takes land out of production to blunt agriculture’s environmental impact. 

The Biden administration announced on Wednesday that it would expand a program that pays farmers to leave land fallow, part of a broader, government-wide effort to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030. The new initiative will incentivize farmers to take land out of production by raising rental rates and incentive payments. 

The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) was created in 1985 to incentivize landowners to leave some of their marginal land unplanted, a plan meant to protect the environment by reducing agricultural runoff into streams and rivers, preserving wildlife habitats, and preventing erosion. Today, the Department of Agriculture (USDA) “rents” about 21 million acres of farmland from landowners, typically for 10 years at a time—a tiny fraction of the total land farmed nationwide. In recent years, the number of acres enrolled in CRP has fallen, possibly because USDA’s rental payments have not been competitive with the open market, Chuck Abbott reported for FERN News.

Smashing and Recycling Old Tractors Helps Assure Air Quality Benefits for the San Joaquin Valley https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/ca/home/?cid=STELPRDB1186960

Override Inslee’s snub of bipartisanship and rural WA

THE LISTENERS:

Todd,

Can you help me get the word out to correct the record on the immigration issue that is about to explode? The news keeps reporting that those crossing the border are being released because of a lack of detention space. NOT TRUE. The NWIPC in Tacoma currently has less that 300 in spite of a capacity of 1500.  This is true of most of the detention facilities. They have chosen to NOT detain recent arrivals. It has been that way since Biden took office.

Also - great job on the podcast. You should be proud of what you’re building.

- A high-ranking, federal immigration official

---   ---   ---   ---

Tonya:

I've very much appreciated your ability to see clearly through the covid-flu, PCR scam, and injection nonsense early on! Thanks for sharing information that kept us clear on what was going on these last few years!

I'm wondering if you might also offer similar clarity on the discussion around "vaccine shedding", whereby the non-jabbed who live with and/or work closely with the injected are getting some transfer. And if true, what that might mean for the unjabbed. And how long post-jab could the shedding continue?

If you've got the interest/ability, here's a specific scenario I'd appreciate your input on:

I know 2 babies (under 1 yr) who have mastocytosis (looks like birthmarks on the skin, those marks multiply, and those spots can be on organs inside the body).

From what I understand (and according to the pediatric dermatologist treating one of these babies), this is supposed to be very rare...yet, I personally know 2 babies who have it. One mom was jabbed during pregnancy and the other was jabbed while still breastfeeding. My gut says this mastocytosis is a reaction to the mama's ill-informed decisions to get jabbed.

I'd appreciate your trustworthy research skills to better understand...and yet, I suspect any potential damage has already been done.

Thanks again -- enjoy listening when you were on the radio, and now your daily podcast!

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More episodes
Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu