Get Rich Education
Get Rich Education
Aug 17, 2020
306: Homelessness and Real Estate, Chicago Is World Class
Play episode · 53 min

You contribute to homelessness. I do too. The problem goes right through real estate.

Factors include: NIMBYism, minimum wage, salamanders, smoke detectors, and rent control.

(Complete transcript on homelessness segment below.)

Then, Chicago is a world class city with lots of economic diversification. Chicagoland’s numbers make sense for real estate investors.

In northwestern Indiana (suburban Chicago), you avoid the high cost of Illinois property. 

A typical SFH has $1,350 rent and a $125,000 purchase price.

If you’re serious about building your cash-flowing portfolio, learn more and see property at: www.GetRichEducation.com/Chicago

Resources mentioned:

Chicagoland turnkey property:

www.GetRichEducation.com/Chicago

Environmental regulations & housing:

https://www.huduser.gov/periodicals/cityscpe/vol8num1/ch5.pdf

NIMBYism:

Reason.com

Mortgage Loans:

RidgeLendingGroup.com

QRPs: text “QRP” in ALL CAPS to 72000 or:

eQRP.co

By texting “QRP” to 72000 and opting in, you will receive periodic marketing messages from eQRP Co. Message & data rates may apply. Reply “STOP” to cancel.

New Construction Turnkey Property:

NewConstructionTurnkey.com

Best Financial Education:

GetRichEducation.com

Top Properties & Providers:

GREturnkey.com

Follow us on Instagram:

@getricheducation

Keith’s personal Instagram:

@keithweinhold

 

Welcome to Get Rich Education! I’m your host, Keith Weinhold, with a two-part show.

Real estate is a substantial input into homelessness. Why are people homeless - and why might you & I be partly RESPONSIBLE for it, in fact?

 

The second part - in general, world class cities don’t make any sense to invest in for cash flow - New York, LA, DC, London, Singapore … but we’re going to discuss one “world class” city that actually DOES. Today, on Get Rich Education.

__________________

 

Here it is - hey! You’re inside GRE. From Sarasota, Florida to Sarajevo - in Bosnia and Herzegovina - and across 188 nations worldwide. 

 

I’m Keith Weinhold, this is Get Rich Education.

 

Even in the affluent United States, there is a large and growing population of vagrants - homeless people … more than half a million of them … and you & I … unknowingly play a role in keeping them homeless.

 

Why are people homeless? Well, the #1 reason is real estate-related. So that’s why I’m talking about it in the first of two show segments here.

 

Let’s look at the Top 5 cited reasons that people are homeless.

 

5th most common - Substance abuse - drugs.

4th - Mental illness.

3rd - Poverty ...OK, that’s sort of an obvious one.

2nd - Unemployment

1st - Lack of affordable housing

 

Lack of affordable housing is the #1 reason that people are homeless. Well, one mission here at GRE is that we PROVIDE society with affordable housing.

 

But, it’s generally not the same kind of Class D, lowest-end housing that there is - and that homeless people are looking to get into. 

 

We focus on properties just below the median housing price in some of the lower-cost U.S. metros - B-class and C-Class. That’s a notch or two above where those on the brink of homelessness would be.

 

The homeless population is more visible in my own home city since the pandemic - and perhaps yours too … now that the unemployment rate is 10%. 

 

I’m going to tell you what contributes to homelessness - and a lot of this has to do with real estate: contributors are carbon monoxide detectors, minimum wage, salamanders, NIMBYism, and over the long term: rent control.

 

Now, before we unpack that. Let’s define homelessness.

 

One of the better accepted definitions is - a condition where people lack "a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence". That’s “homelessness defined”. 

 

I think you & I can agree that “homeless” is not the best technical term - right? Because even if someone lives under a bridge, that IS their home.

 

Houselessness would actually be more accurate.

 

Vagrancy is an even better way to say it. A vagrant is a person without a settled home or regular work who wanders from place to place and lives by begging.

 

That’s what we’re really talking about here. But homelessness is the widely understood term, so I’m going to it.

 

Now, HUD - the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has a lot of statistics on the homeless, and ...

 

… as of 2018, they reported there were roughly 553,000 homeless people in the United States on a given night,[2] or nearly two-tenths of 1% of the population. 

 

That’s about 1 in 500 Americans then. Well, many people - me included - believe that the real number of homeless is greater than this 553,000.

 

In fact, private & local reports tell you that the homelessness have increased 40% per annum in recent years - yeah, 40% per year!

 

A big mistake is that people think about the homeless as all one type. But there are so many different types of homeless. 

 

There are the temporary homeless -  passing through that 553,000 number.

 

Some are voluntarily homeless. Others are really couch-surfing because perhaps they were in a divorce or domestic violence situation.

 

Then you need to realize that about 2/3rd of their population is sheltered, and ⅓ unsheltered. 

 

Consider too, that there are at least 40,000 homeless veterans. To think that a person could have served this country - and maybe even risked their life for this country - but don’t have a home in this country … can be heartbreaking to think about.

 

Now, though I’m not sure, I don’t believe that a digital nomad would be considered among the homeless - the laptop entrepreneur that stays at a different AirBnB location, say monthly.   

 

Before we bring in the real estate angle, let’s get some historical context. Just talking about the U.S. here ...

 

Homelessness emerged as a national issue in the 1870s.[6] Early homeless people lived in emerging urban cities, like New York City

 

Into the 20th century, the Great Depression of the 1930s caused a substantial rise in unemployment and related social issues and distress and homelessness. 

 

In the 21st century the financial crisis of 2008 and resulting economic stagnation and downturn has been a major driving factor and contributor to rising homelessness rates.

 

That is probably happening again, right now, in the COVID pandemic.

 

A Zillow report found that people in communities where the average renter spends more than 30 percent of their income on rent — meaning that they can be described as being “rent-burdened” — are particularly vulnerable to rapid increases in homelessness rates.

 

Eviction obviously creates homelessness.

 

Now, some naively think - can’t we just raise taxes to build permanent housing for them & move them all in there? I really doubt that that’s a viable long-term solution. 

 

Because at some point, if taxpayer funded housing is just “provided” for people, then people don’t have incentive to work & pay the rent.

 

That’s in general. Right, maybe someone has a disability that prevents them from making a living. 

 

Some think - maybe we SHOULD impose rent control. Rent control means capping the amount of rent that a landlord can charge.

 

I’ll tell ya - that could reduce the number of homeless people in some areas that HAVE enough housing. But long-term, rent control is a terrible plan.

 

Because now an income property owner like you has zero incentive to improve the property any longer. 

 

Long-term, rent controlled areas fall into serious dilapidation. 

 

And because homelessness is concentrated in inner cities. It’s those exact same big cities - like New York - that have tried rent control. 

 

It doesn’t work. So many areas that have tried to impose it, have to repeal it, because it eventually turns areas into ghettos.

 

What if you own property in an area where rent control were imposed? Even if you did improve your property - not only would you NOT get more rent for it - but you had better believe that property owners all around you wouldn’t be improving their property … and the entire condition of the neighborhood would be on a loooong downhill slide.

 

You might remember that I devoted an episode to the rent control topic. You can look that up on Get Rich Education Episode 192 if you’re further interested there. 

 

One factor that contributes to higher housing costs - which prices people out of having any shelter and creates more homeless people are … environmental regulations that limit development in certain areas.

 

Sometimes you need to leave a development buffer for streams or you can’t build in areas that are wetlands in order to protect flora and fauna.

 

A rare orchid, or a spotted salamander or a threatened egret or an endangered heron. They say, you can’t build in their critical habitat areas. You’ve got to protect them.

 

But yet, often, the same type of people that want more environmental regulations are the same people that say that they want more affordable housing options.

 

Well, when you limit where you can build, now you’ve reduced the housing supply. Real estate pricing is highly susceptible to supply/demand factors, of course.

 

All these wildlife protections limit supply. That makes prices go up. That prices people out.

 

Now, maybe you’re thinking I’m anti-environmentalist? No, I’m not taking a side either way. 

 

It’s just that one needs to understand the cost and the longer-term ramifications of decisions that limit development in protecting the spotted salamander. 

 

I think it’s easy to make a case that more biodiversity is better than less biodiversity. But the better question is: “At what cost should we protect species? How far do we take it?” 

 

Environmental regulations in the United States are intended to improve the quality of the environment; preserve ecosystems - that includes wildlife; and protect human health too.

 

But these regulations are often written without considering how much they will cost.

 

Another contributor to homelessness is excessive safety regulations.

 

Again, some safety regulations are good. But how far do we take it? 

 

My gosh, when an area needs to build more affordable housing for people - which is something that would reduce the homeless rate … and ...

 

Sheesh, a new home today might need fourteen smoke detectors and five carbon monoxide detectors … then the detectors need to be connected to each other so that they can communicate with each other … and all these devices and this added complexity increases the cost of housing.

 

That makes mortgage payments higher, rent payments higher, and it just prices more people out of the real estate market. The lower end of the income spectrum gets priced out of affordable shelter.

 

I’m not anti-safety. But at some point, one has got to ask the question, “How much safety do we really need?” 

 

Even - “What is the cost of a human life?” There actually is an answer to that question. In fact, the EPA pegs the cost of a human life at $10M - one of the highest of any federal agency.  

 

And then, there’s the entire question of how can you ever monetize the value of a human life. You can make the case … that it’s priceless. That’s a different discussion.   

 

But the point is, all these safety regulations increase the cost of housing and increase homelessness.

 

Minimum wage does, in many instances, increase homelessness long-term. 

 

This might come as a surprise to you. You would think that raising the minimum wage would have to DE-crease homelessness - because a higher wage would mean that low-income workers could now afford housing.

 

Well, long-term, besides higher wages in an area creating inflation & soon making the cost of everything go UP - including housing …

 

Think about it from the perspective of if you’re an employer & you have to pay your workers a higher wage - now that minimum wage is higher.

 

If someone that works for you makes $9 an hour - but they only produce $12 an hour worth of productivity for you...  

 

And a new minimum wage of $15 an hour is implemented, you’re losing money if you retain that worker. So you would lay them off.

 

You would find ways to automate - or make a machine do the work that that employee used to do for you. That layoff increases homelessness.

 

Just look at the number of self-serve checkout kiosks in grocery stores. Those lanes used to be staffed by humans that earned a wage.

 

With a hike in the minimum wage up to $15 an hour, you’d begin to see a trend where more fast-food restaurants have self-serve kiosks. You’ll have fewer humans there.

 

That’s because some employers can’t afford to pay people $15 an hour. Every self-serve digital kiosk that you see represents a laid-off worker.

 

Talk to your parents or grandparents and they’ll tell you that gas stations used to be attended by humans that would pump your gas for you, check your tire pressure, check your fluid levels - that’s been gone for a couple generations.

 

Now, an increase in the minimum wage would help get some people out of homelessness short-term … yes. 

 

I’m giving you insight so that you can see both sides & see the long-term consequences of government intervention into the free market.

 

Let’s say that you’re an employer at a warehouse, the minimum wage is $15 an hour and you want to hire someone to help you sweep floors & do odd maintenance jobs around this warehouse that you own.  

 

Well, now it’s illegal for you to hire them at $12 an hour. You’d love to give a kid a job and help him learn - and you can’t make the numbers work at $15 an hour. 

 

So now he’s unemployed because the government said, “No. You can’t hire him at $12 an hour.” That’s what a $15 minimum wage says. Try looking at it from that angle.

 

Another phenomenon that keeps people homeless is NIMBY - Not In My Backyard.

 

NIMBYists are the ones that say, “No, I don’t want you to build low-cost housing in my neighborhood, because I’m afraid that it’s going to ruin the character of my neighborhood and it’ll stifle the rate of home appreciation here.”

 

Lafayette, California is a wealthy San Francisco suburb. It is nestled in Contra Costa County, where its residents fight to stop what they call a "very urban," "unsightly" 315-unit housing development 

 

It was recently profiled by The New York Times.

 

Over in the suburban community of Cupertino, California—we’re talking Silicon Valley now—local activists spent years trying to stop the development of an abandoned mall into apartments, half of which would be rented out to lower-income tenants at below-market rates.

In  Berkeley, California, activists often argue against new housing on the grounds that it will threaten their community's sustainable character.

Well, what is another example of NIMBYism? 

At a recent Zoning Adjustment Board Meeting in Berkeley, I think one resident summarized NIMBYism really well - and this was published in the New York Times - they said "Berkeley needs to prioritize a livable, sustainable environment for people who already live here” …

… when they were opposing a 57-unit development of student housing. They went on to say: "We are not obligated to sacrifice what is best about Berkeley to build dorm rooms." That’s the end of what they said.

NIMBY - this “Not in My Backyard” opposition to new housing development - centers on concerns of property values and crime and gentrification and environmental sustainability. 

Even though it’s often not their intent, the result of NIMBYism is that less housing gets built, housing costs go up and homelessness … rises.

So, let’s draw some conclusions here and look at some actionable ways that you can make things better.

 

Though it isn’t immediately apparent - carbon monoxide detectors, minimum wage, salamanders & egrets, rent control, and NIMBYism - all go right through the heart of real estate investing and contribute to the long-term cycle of homelessness.

 

A giant takeaway for you here, is that, what is the common denominator in ALL of these factors. There is one common theme. 

 

You know what that is - it is Government intervention.

 

Government intervention and interference in the free market - is the contributor here - excessive safety, minimum wage, protecting salamanders & egrets, rent control, and NIMBYism. 

 

Every single one of them. 

 

And now, maybe if you’re a new Get Rich Education listener - especially - you might be wondering, am I some anti-government guy where I think that the answer to EVERYTHING is free market economics.

 

Well, though I think that less government would be better. 

 

I’ll tell you that SOME government regulation is good - just less than what we have now. 

 

For example, look at all the smoky, hazy pollution in Pittsburgh, PA in the 1970s. It was a hazard to your health just to walk Pittsburgh then.

 

You might have heard about this: famously, in the summer of 1969 - An oil slick in Ohio’s Cuyuhoga River caught on fire.

 

Companies were committing rampant pollution such that it was a hazard to human health.

Well, government regulations like the Federal Clean Water Act Of 1972 helped to clean that up.

 

So, that regulation helped. Government has a role, but it’s often overly intrusive.

 

When it comes to you helping the homeless directly, I like the campaign slogan that says, “Give real change, not small change.” 

 

That means, don’t give money directly to panhandlers on the street. Where do you think that your goes then? Probably straight to cheap monarch vodka in those plastic bottles.

 

Also, if you don’t want to see homeless people in your neighbourhood, don’t give to them if they’re on your city’s street corner - like they are mine - because you’ve just given them an incentive to show up there again & do the same thing.

 

So instead of small change, give real change. When you donate to your local homeless shelter or soup kitchen, your money is going to do MORE REAL GOOD for the homeless.

 

It’s going to provide them with shelter, or educational resources, or a computer so that they might be able to apply for a job. That’s real change.

 

You want to help the homeless? I think that’s great. That’s kind. Give real change, not small change.

 

When it comes to NIMBYism and the environment, there’s a great saying out there.

 

What do you call a developer –  someone who wants to build a house.  Well, what do you call an environmentalist – someone who already owns the house, [LAUGHING] because they don’t want anyone else to build there, right?

 

Well, we avoid investing in coastal areas here at Get Rich Education. They’re what I call the volatile markets - they have a history of more regulation, more rent control, and more laws that are disadvantageous to property owners.

 

Just more reason … as to why we invest in the U.S. Midwest & South. They’re what I call the stable markets.

 

You’re listening to Get Rich Education, Episode 306.

 

We are your source for independent groundbreaking, original content on really three main topics: real estate investing is what we major in - with minors in both wealth mindset, and real estate economics. 

 

Get Rich Education is not affiliated with any large media conglomerate. 

 

And we’re here to enrich you - and sometimes even rescue you & help you survive in this widening difference between the “haves” and “have nots” - that continues to broaden in pandemic times.

 

This show is also when you can find all your finance heroes - that have come onto the show to run alongside me for an episode.

 

Check our shows published over the years to find me here with the best-seller finance author of all-time Robert Kiyosaki, the world’s leading sales trainer Grant Cardone, global wealth mindset magnate T. Harv Eker, and other economic minds and thought leaders Jim Rogers, Jim Rickards, Sharon Lechter - all your favorite thought leaders are here on this show.

 

We have more of them coming onto the show in the future, including the upcoming Get Rich Education debut of success thought leader Hal Elrod and others.

 

There is so much real estate & economics news that the pandemic is providing to us ... more & faster than before.

 

We bring you that here. Also, be sure to subscribe to the DQYDD Letter. That’s our wealth-building email letter that you can get at GetRichEducation.com

 

A lot of times, I can write you something in the letter faster than I can get it out here on our weekly show. Yes, I do write the letter myself - and email it directly to you.

 

Never any spam - never sharing your email address with others, of course.

 

Also, would you like to join me on a live webinar? We’re looking at doing some of those soon. Look for those announcements - in the Don’t Quit Your Daydream Letter as well.

 

Information, actionable resources, and education -  

 

Get ahold of that completely free - at GetRichEducation.com

 

Again, What do you call a developer –  someone who wants to build a house.  What do you call an environmentalist – someone who already owns the house.

 

Kind of exciting next - A world class city where the real estate numbers actually make sense for you … straight ahead.

 

I’m Keith Weinhold. This is Get Rich Education.

The Remote Real Estate Investor
The Remote Real Estate Investor
Roofstock
Real Estate Is Like A Bond Indexed For Inflation With An Equity Kicker w/CEO Gary Beasley
Michael: Hey everybody, welcome to another episode of The Remote Real Estate Investor. This is our weekend wisdom episode. I'm Michael album and joined today by Tom Schneider and Roofstock CEO, Gary Beasley. Theme song Michael: So, Gary, we want to ask you a question about what is your favorite metric to use when evaluating properties? And how do you think about that metric when it comes to total return. Gary: So I like to think of single family rental homes as sort of like a bond that's indexed for inflation with an equity kicker, and I'll explain what I mean by that. And the reason I think it's particularly relevant right now, is we're in a low interest rate environment, people do feel like with all the money we've been printing over the last few years, there is a potential for inflation down the road. So you want to think about what kind of investments could potentially be inflation hedges in case inflation. And the Fed has said, we're gonna keep rates low, and we're not so worried about inflation, so we're not gonna be as aggressive in raising rates. And then you've got this equity kicker element in homes, which is really the appreciation component of it. So let me tell you what I mean. So the bond component is that the cash flow that you could generate from the home when you own it, and that's like the bond piece every year, you could raise the rent to at least keep up with inflation, because their annual contract. So if there's a lot of inflation in the market, you can raise the rent. So if you had to sign a 10 year lease that was flat and inflation went up, you would be in trouble. So you've got that annual indexing. And then you've got the capital appreciation piece, which if the property goes up, you know, 3%, a year or 4%, a year, which is historically has done over the long term, you get that capital appreciation piece, like you would get, say, in a stock with a stock value going up, you've got the value of your underlying asset going up. And what's nice about real estate, unlike with stocks, which are harder to, in most cases, put leverage against unless you have a margin account, anyone could get a loan for a house. And so you could get a 70 or 80% loan on the house. And I like to give a you know, very simple example, if you have a home that basically just covers its costs over, say, a five year period, but it goes up at three and a half percent a year and you have an 80% loan on it, you could get a 14 or 15% annualized return on that, because you've got someone else paying down your mortgage and creating principal value, you've got, you know, you're you're riding the property value along, and you're getting kind of four to one leverage on your equity. So when you sell it, your annualized return over that period can actually be quite high, even if you're not pulling money out or getting current return along the way. So when I look at investing in homes, the yield is one component of it. But I'm really more of a total return investor, I don't necessarily feel like I need to pull the money out every month and then spend it or put it into something else, what I'm trying to do is create value in that asset. And so I like the idea of having someone else pay down the loan balance for me, and create value over time just by getting that exposure to housing, and letting the market be your friend. And then at some point in the future, if you decide to liquidate it, you've got a lot of hopefully embedded equity value, that's when you could sort of realize the benefits of that investment. Michael: That's a great kind of analogy and pictorial representation. Can you talk just real briefly about how a bond works if somebody wanted to go buy a bond, so that way they can compare that investment versus real estate? How does that traditionally work? Gary: Yeah. So when you buy a bond, what you buy is a coupon on that that bond, and then you get your money back. So you could buy a municipal bond or Treasury, something like that. And let's say you get an interest rate on that bond of 3%. And you buy your hundred dollar bond, and you get $3, every year back. And then at the end of that term, you get your hundred dollars back. That's the entirety of your return. And that's a 3% annualized return, because you're getting your 3% every year, the difference between like a bond and a single family rental home, which you might be able to get a similar kind of return every year on a home, but the value of the underlying home is going up. And so then instead of getting $100 back, maybe you get $120 back, right and so that's where that's that equity kicker piece that I'm talking about. That's over and above that bond piece. Michael: Already, everyone that was our quick weekend wisdom a big big, big thank you to Gary super informative. If you enjoyed the podcast, please feel free to leave us a rating and review wherever it is you listen to your podcast. We look forward to seeing the next one. Happy investing
5 min
Apartment Building Investing with Michael Blank Podcast
Apartment Building Investing with Michael Blank Podcast
Michael Blank
MB 236: The Financial Freedom to Do What You Love – With Megan Lamke
Time is precious. Are you spending your days doing what you love with the people you love? What if multifamily real estate could help you do just that? What if you could achieve financial freedom fast—regardless of your current financial situation? Megan Lamke is Managing Partner at Megan Lamke Real Estate, a firm that helps driven women turn their grit into true financial growth. She built a network of real estate investors working for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, and once she and her husband, Darik, had paid off their personal debt ($535K in under 5 years!), they started investing passively in multifamily syndications. Megan quit her corporate job to pursue active investing full-time in April of 2019, and today, the Lamkes have a portfolio of 1,491 units valued at $344M. On this episode of Apartment Building Investing, Megan joins me to explain why she took a W-2 job after college (despite wanting to become a real estate entrepreneur) and what she and Darik did to live below their means and pay off their debt so fast. She describes what she did to find a good operator as a passive investor and how she leveraged her sales and marketing background to transition to active investing. Listen in for Megan’s insight on how to raise capital at scale with a platform and learn how YOU can achieve financial freedom and spend time doing what you love! Key Takeaways When Megan started thinking about real estate * Parents struggled financially, read Rich Dad Poor Dad at age 10 * Entrepreneurship and business clubs in high school and college Why Megan took a W-2 job after college * Needed to pay off student loan debt before leave Rat Race * Learned sales skills, got to work with real estate investors What Megan and her husband did to live below their means * Sold luxury cars, bought cars for cash * House hacked 6BR (rented to rugby teammates) * Side hustle as sales and marketing consultant How Megan and her husband got on the same page financially * Financial literacy class as part of premarital counseling * Set goal to pay off debt, achieve financial freedom How Megan’s strategy shifted once she was out of debt * Sold 6BR house to invest passively in multifamily syndications * Goal to replace corporate salary as quickly as possible Megan’s advice on finding a good multifamily operator * Look at track record, online reviews, lawsuits and marketing efforts * Ask questions re: where properties located, how managed, etc. What Megan’s last day of work was like * Surreal (like leaving the Matrix) * Culmination of goal that started in fifth grade How Megan’s life is different now that she’s a full-time investor * Control own time (decide when to work) * Spend more time with daughter, volunteering What active investing looks like for Megan * Use SDA to underwrite 10 deals/day (300 in 2019) * Leverage background in sales and marketing to build out platform What Megan has done to scale her capital raise efforts * Done-for-you tech stack to automate lead gen, booking calls * 30 to 37 calls with prospective investors every week What Megan is doing to attract prospective investors to her platform * Create content (social media, videos, blog and weekly webinar) * Sponsor real estate events, promote lead magnet on podcasts How Megan describes her ideal investor * Successful career woman age 40-55, primary breadwinner * Gritty and knows how to get stuff done How the automation works to turn interested prospects into investors * Receive automated email with free download * Follow up with drip marketing campaign to encourage call How much capital Megan has raised through her online platform * $18M raise to close on $49M apartment building * In process of closing on $18M 503(c) How raising capital looks different now that Megan has a platform * Don’t have to call each investor, track follow-up manually * One centralized management tool that automatically follows up Connect with Megan Lamke Megan Lamke Real Estate Megan’s No-Nonsense Women’s Guide to Investing Megan on Facebook Megan on Instagram Megan on LinkedIn Resources Register for Michael’s Platform Builder Incubator Join the Nighthawk Equity Investor Club Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert T. Kiyosaki Business Professionals of America DECA Dave Ramsey Robert Kiyosaki Financial Freedom with Real Estate Investing: The Blueprint to Quitting Your Job with Real Estate—Even without Experience or Cash by Michael Blank The Miracle Morning: The Not-So-Obvious Secret Guaranteed to Transform Your Life (Before 8AM) by Hal Elrod Michael’s Syndicated Deal Analyzer Trello Investor Deal Room Podcast Show Notes Michael’s Website Michael on Facebook Michael on Instagram Michael on YouTube Apartment Investor Network Facebook Group
36 min
Sell or Die with Jeffrey Gitomer and Jennifer Gluckow
Sell or Die with Jeffrey Gitomer and Jennifer Gluckow
Sell or Die
Lets Talk Payroll Systems with Jonathan Gallagher
In episode 522 of the Sell or Die Podcast, we have special guest Jonathan Gallagher. Jonathon is co-founder of Coastal Payroll Services, a San Diego based payroll and HR service provider. In this episode, we are diving into the topic of payroll, because it’s something everyone uses. Jonathan shares his background and how he got involved with Coastal Payroll Services, as well as the opportunity he saw to set his company apart from others. Some key points we discuss include: * Jonathan discusses his background and how he went from an ADP employee to co-founder of Coastal Payroll Services. * Jonathan shares how sales opportunities opened up for him after getting involved with Coastal Payroll Services. * Jonathan teaches us how to utilize an economic downturn as a time to gain customer trust. * And finally, Jonathan explains how having an outstanding corporate culture leads to a remarkable business Jonathon has grown his team to over 13 people and they are currently seeing some remarkable results. The future looks very promising for both him and Coastal Payroll Services. There’s opportunity everywhere, you just have to be willing to be of true value and help like Jonathon. To hear more about payroll systems and Jonathon’s story, don’t forget to tune in to episode 522 of the Sell or Die Podcast. See you next week for another episode of Sell or Die! If you enjoyed this episode, take a screenshot of the episode to post in your stories and tag us, @jengitomer & @jeffreygitomer! And don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and review the podcast and share your key takeaways with us! Rise.com Free 30 Day Trial CONNECT WITH JEN & JEFFREY: Official Website Jeffrey’s Instagram Jennifer’s Instagram Sell or Die Hards Official Group
49 min
The Brian Buffini Show
The Brian Buffini Show
Brian Buffini
Making Your Quantum Leap, Part 2 #247
“You’re more ready for a quantum leap than you know.” – Brian Buffini If you want to make extraordinary breakthroughs and achieve higher performance levels, you must take action. In this episode, the second part of a session recorded live at MasterMind Summit, Brian takes a deep dive into how to make a quantum leap in your life. He explains why you should trust your gut, while also knowing the difference between your instincts and a whim; how your past successes can become your prison; and why you already have everything you need to make a quantum leap if you let others help you. YOU WILL LEARN: * What you have now that you didn’t have before. * What a quantum leap is, and what it isn’t. * What you need to do before you take the leap. MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE: Buffini & Company MasterMind Summit “Chicken Soup for the Soul,” by Jack Canfield and Mark Victor Hansen “The Alchemist,” by Paulo Coelho The John Brockington Foundation INSPIRATIONAL QUOTES FROM THIS EPISODE: “I would rather trust my gut and suffer failure than not trust my gut and have some moderate success.” – Brian Buffini “Every time you take a risk or move out of your comfort zone, you have a great opportunity to learn more about yourself and your capacity.” – Jack Canfield “Before anything else, preparation is the key to success.” – Alexander Graham Bell “Unsuccessful people make decisions based on their current situation. Successful people make their decisions based on where they want to be.” – Anonymous “Be brave. Take risks. Nothing can substitute experience.” – Paulo Coelho https://www.TheBrianBuffiniShow.com http://www.brianbuffini.com Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/brian_buffini Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/brianbuffini Twitter: https://twitter.com/brianbuffini Theme Music: “The Cliffs of Moher” by Brogue Wave
25 min
Sales Gravy: Jeb Blount
Sales Gravy: Jeb Blount
Jeb Blount
Why You Should Stop Trying to Sell Yourself
Sales Myth: You Have to Sell Yourself Most of us, at one time or another in our careers, have heard some trainer or manager exclaim, “You have to sell yourself.” “If you want to get that job, son, you have to sell yourself.” “The real key to sales is your ability to sell yourself.” “If you want others to like you, you’ll have to sell yourself.” The Sell Yourself Cliche This philosophy is prevalent in business culture. A while back, I was at an Ivy League University for a speech by a successful businessman to a group of MBA students from the top business schools in the world. The speaker was so well respected that when he walked into the room there was a hush. The audience members were on the edge of their seats in anticipation. And what was the message? What was the secret of success that this revered businessman offered? “Never forget how important it is in business to first sell yourself.” The entire audience nodded in unison. For this wise man and many others, the phrase sell yourself  has become an easy-to-use cliche´. It just rolls off the tongue. Like the audience at the speech I at-tended, most people will nod their heads in agreement to the statement as if some prophet on a hill had just read it from stone tablets. People Buy You for Their Reasons, Not Yours Sales expert and bestselling author Jeffrey Gitomer teaches a simple philosophy, “People love to buy but they hate to be sold.” In other words, most people prefer to buy on their terms. They do not want or appreciate a hard pitch or a features dump. The buy for their reasons not yours. Yet daily salespeople across the globe, on the phone, video calls, email, social media, and in person, sell to their customers by dumping data, pushing their position, or simply trying to talk their way into a sale. The sell themselves to anyone else they can get to stand still for more than five minutes. But it does not work, because people like to buy, they don’t like to be sold. When You Try to Sell Yourself You Push People Away The harder you try to sell yourself to others, the more you push them away. A conversation where the other person tells you all about themselves, their accomplishments, and how great they are is a turnoff. It is a features dump. Think about it, the most unlikeable human in the world is the person standing in front of you talking about themselves. You don’t walk away from that conversation thinking how much you would like to spend more time with them. Instead you think, “What a jerk,” or “How boring,” or “Wow,  that guy is full of himself.” We Love to Talk About Our Favorite Person Still, we do love the opportunity to sell ourselves. Most of us, if given the opportunity, will talk for hours about our favorite person, oblivious to the negative impact it has on how we are viewed by others. When pressed, experts who are quick to tell you to sell yourself, are unable to explain exactly how to do it. Sure, they will offer tips, but it's mostly hyperbole. Here is the brutal truth: You cannot sell yourself to others; you have to get others to buy you on their terms. You're Talking, They Aren't Buying Even if you are preceded by a great reputation and others are anticipating meeting you, your attempts to sell yourself can backfire. I learned this lesson at a speech I gave to a large dinner group. One of the audience members was such a big fan of one of my books, that he lobbied the meeting organizer to be seated right next to me. During dinner he asked me questions, and I talked and talked and talked—about me. A few days after the speech, I called the meeting organizer to follow up and offer my thanks. I thanked him for seating Daniel next to me and asked him if Daniel had had a good time. He hesitated for a moment and finally said, “I’m telling you this because I like you; but Daniel did not come away with a very good opinion of you.” It was like being punched in the gut!
7 min
More episodes
Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu