Case #112A: The Proud Boys
Play episode · 1 hr 2 min

Occultae Veritatis Podcast


Case #112A: The Proud Boys


Part 1 of 2. We review the views of Gavin Mcinnes, and how those views were used to influence disillusioned men to join an organization, participate in demonstrations and provocations, and assault people during rallies and protests.


Subscribe to the show here:

Support the Show:


Pallet Cleanser:

Colonel Bogey March- Lieutenant F. J. Ricketts


Topics Mentioned:

Gavin McInnes, Feminism, White guys, Homophobia, Racism, Islamophobia, Racism, Hate, Bullying, parents Muslims, politics, white supremacy, honor killings, religion, black, polyester , immigration, Bernie Sanders, Violence, Alpha Males, Beta Males, Shootings, Men are Tough, Heathenism, Modern Chauvinism, Proud Boys, Club, Nazi, Sexism, Transphobia, Berkeley, Unite the Right, Patriots day, New york Republicans club



The Best of Gavin McInnes



Cheesy Porn Music 2 One 4 Studios


Gary Younge interviews Richard Spencer: 'Africans have benefited from white supremacy'

The Guardian


Disney's Aladdin The Broadway Musical-Proud Of Your Boy

Nina Miranda Guillen


Proud Boy Initiation Seattle Washington The Common Sense Conservative


I Met Some of Kyle Chapman's Alt-Knights in Austin, TX



Gavin McInnes: Is Fred Perry Racist?

The Rebel


Why Big Government Is At War With The Family

Lauren Southern


Milo Yiannopoulos gives thoughts on pedophilia

Drunken Peasants podcast


Arrests, fights break out at Berkeley protests


Sofa King Podcast
Sofa King Podcast
Sofa King Podcast
Episode 525: The Boston Strangler: A Serial Killer Classic
On this True Crime episode of the Sofa King Podcast, we look at the infamous case of the serial killer known as the Boston Strangler. Between the years of 1962 and 1964, thirteen women were found killed and strangled in the Boston area. Most were over the age of 60, and no real suspects were being tracked by the police. Meanwhile, a man named Albert DeSalvo was on a spree of serial raping through the area, posing as a repair man or a man from a modeling agency. How do the two things tie together? Why does DNA evidence make officials think DeSalvo is the Boston Strangler, but many experts doubt he did it? Albert DeSalvo checks all the serial killer boxes. His father was a drunk who knocked every single one of his wife’s teeth out and bent all of her fingers back so far they broke. He’d sleep with hookers in their house and force his Albert to watch it. Needless to say, Albert grew up troubled. He tortured and killed animals and was first arrested for robbery and assault at the age of twelve. He was in and out of juvenile detention until he joined the army and things seemed to settle down for him. But, once he was an adult, he took on the persona of The Measuring Man and the Green Man. These were disguises and acts he’d put on to get into a woman’s house and sexually assault them. One source says he assaulted as many as 300 women this way. He did some jail time, got out, started again, and got arrested for it again. Meanwhile, the Boston Strangler started killing people. They were strangled with panties or silk stockings, and they were left on their beds to be discovered. The police had no reason to link DeSalvo to the murders, but in jail, he told another inmate all about it. This inmate, George Nassar, told his lawyer, and eventually DeSalvo confessed to all the crimes with a great degree of detail. However, there was no physical evidence, so he went to trial for the rapes and other charges. So, why do people think he was the Strangler if there is no actual evidence? What lead a member of Whitey Bulger’s Winter Hill gang to kill him in prison back in 1973? Why does an FBI profiler doubt he was the Strangler? Why do some think the Boston Strangler was Nassar, who DeSalvo first confessed to in prison? What did DNA evidence prove about the murders? Listen, laugh, learn.     Visit Our Sources:
1 hr 34 min
More episodes
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu